Dear INARCASSA
Dear National Council of Engineers
Respectable. the National Council of Architects
The Ministry of Labour and Social Security
The Ministry of Economy and Finance
For Subscribers Orders of Engineers and Architects of Italy
SUBJECT: statutory changes approved by the National Committee of Delegates of the meeting of 25-26-27 INARCASSA June and 21-22 July 2008. INARCASSA instance of members of a review of the changes.
Given that
· The increase in the subjective input of a fraction of 45% in just four years, and the doubling of the supplementary contribution, would entail a rapid contribution burden is difficult to justify for many members, especially considering the difficult lives today market in the world professional
· data parameters and assumptions for actuarial valuations appear to be strongly attached to the technical report on random so that, within a few months of their presentation, are already low credibility . Moreover, the reliability of a forecast of the trend demographic and economic impact of the professional world in the next five years is inevitably affected by very large uncertainties;
· In any case, by the actuarial study shows that problems in coverage of disbursements could occur only in long time, but is always a positive forecast for the current account balance over fifteen years;
· expectancy and income per unit of revenue for professional activities related to INARCASSA is generally decreasing in real terms, both for leveling down the market for ever smaller guarantees and protection (eg the repeal of the minimum rates), which, however, is accompanied by an increase in the overall tax burden;
· The figure of the professional writing to the Fund has changed a lot over the years partly as a result of the birth of new professionals (Information Engineering, Environmental, specialists in acoustics, expert health and safety at work ...) operating in sectors insufficiently regulated, requiring no special approval to actually be able to operate on the market resulting in reduced capacity and average income have a greater incidence of pressure to pay that would lead many to rethink the opportunities and registration with the Fund;
· Prior consultation of the basis of members concerning the amendments in question was virtually non-existent and in any case also the information about the application of the same was certainly far enough, or not commensurate to the magnitude of the change;
EVERYTHING 'WHEREAS, I hereby request
· an immediate review of the statutory changes in the subject, providing a greater increase in the time of graduation which will be needed;
· The decision to undertake a review of the escalation is based on projections of long-term actuarial projections at both shorter and therefore more reliable based on parameters, so you can better mediate the needs of long-term sustainability sustainability of the budget with those of contributory membership.
· an immediate revision of the Statute with regard to the system of representation of members by delegates, including a reduction in their number but by providing for mandatory consultation mechanisms, periodic or linked to decisions of major economic and social impact;
· overall attention to the professional world, with particular regard to new jobs (which often operate in areas not regulated and therefore are subject to strong competition and unregulated) and the younger members for which profit margins are often so low that it can not support indiscriminate burdens, regulatory intervention and a reminder of the work fields currently not regulated, so can support the professionalism of the members, and greater consideration of the diversity of income capacity of the various types of professionals: the two are absolutely related.
· to assess the desirability of revising the form of contribution "supplementary" to at least the professional unregulated for which the contribution is in most cases tacitly absorbed by the professional, clear increase in the bill by 2% to 4% will be in fact detrimental than the offer of non-professional competition.
THIS DOCUMENT IS 'SIGNED
IN A FEW DAYS OF ENGINEERS 56 PISTOIA
IN THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment